‘You’re Hired.’ Four Minutes Later: ‘Actually, You’re Not…’ — Korean Court Calls It Unfair Dismissal
A recent decision from the Seoul Administrative Court confirms that once an employer notifies a candidate of acceptance, a valid employment relationship may already exist. Canceling the hire moments later by text message can amount to unlawful dismissal.
Key Facts
- A fintech and internet platform company (Company A) posted a job advertisement seeking someone to lead global strategy and business development.
- Applicant B applied and successfully completed two rounds of interviews.
- On the day of the decision:
- 11:56 AM — Company A sent a text message informing B that they had passed and were hired.
- 12:00 PM — Only four minutes later, the company sent another message canceling the hiring.
Labor Commission Proceedings
- B filed a claim with the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission, alleging unfair cancellation of employment.
- The commission ruled in B’s favor.
- Company A appealed to the National Labor Relations Commission, but the decision was upheld.
- The company then filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn the administrative ruling in court.
Employer’s Arguments
Company A argued that:
- Labor law should not apply because:
- The job was intended for a subsidiary (Company C) with fewer than five employees, which would fall outside certain protections of the Labor Standards Act.
- B was not a “worker” under the Act:
- The company claimed it intended to hire B as a professional executive (전문경영인) rather than as a regular employee.
Court’s Findings
The court rejected the company’s arguments and ruled the cancellation constituted unfair dismissal.
1. The Parent Company and Subsidiary Were Effectively One Workplace
- The court found it difficult to treat Company A and subsidiary C as separate workplaces.
- Reasons included:
- C operated in a very small leased office space (about 3 pyeong / ~10 m²).
- Company A’s website directly promoted C’s travel insurance platform with a dedicated link.
- The businesses appeared operationally integrated, meaning their employee counts should be combined.
- Once combined, the workforce exceeded five employees, making the Labor Standards Act applicable.
2. The Applicant Was Legally a “Worker”
The court held that a labor contract had already been formed.
- The job advertisement = invitation to offer
- B’s application = offer
- Company A’s hiring message = acceptance
Because acceptance was communicated, a binding employment contract was already established.
Additional findings:
- The job posting did not mention hiring a professional executive.
- The interview process never explained such a role.
- A high salary alone does not negate worker status.
- The employer’s claim of a mistaken plan to appoint B as a subsidiary executive lacked evidence.
3. Canceling the Hire Was Legally a Dismissal
- Once the employment contract existed, canceling the hiring effectively constituted a dismissal.
- Under the Labor Standards Act, dismissals must follow statutory procedures, including written notice.
- Sending a unilateral text message canceling the job did not satisfy legal requirements.
Final Outcome
- The Seoul Administrative Court dismissed the company’s lawsuit.
- The earlier labor commission ruling recognizing unfair dismissal remained valid.
Why This Case Matters
This ruling highlights several important principles in Korean labor law:
- A hiring notification can legally finalize an employment contract.
- “Rescinding” a job offer after acceptance may legally count as dismissal.
- Employers cannot avoid labor protections by superficially splitting companies into separate entities.
- Even executive-level hires can still qualify as workers depending on the circumstances.
Article: https://www.lawtimes.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=216975
Leave a comment