Shoved in a Street Argument, She Hit Her Head and Died: Three-Year Sentence Upheld for Boyfriend
A man who pushed his drunk girlfriend during a late-night street argument — causing her to fall and strike her head on concrete, dying five days later — has had his three-year sentence confirmed on appeal, with the court finding that while the outcome was devastating, the intent to cause death was not clearly established. Here are the key points.
Facts
- At around 1:20 AM on December 14, 2025, A argued with his girlfriend B (30) on a street in Daegu’s Jung District after she refused to go home despite being heavily intoxicated. A pushed B, causing her to fall and strike her head hard on the concrete pavement.
- B was taken to hospital for emergency treatment but died five days later from brain hemorrhage.
- A was charged with injury causing death (상해치사) — a charge that sits between assault causing injury and murder, used where physical force causes death without the intent to kill.
Court Decisions
- The trial court sentenced A to three years in prison. Both A and the prosecution appealed — A arguing the sentence was too harsh, the prosecution arguing it was too lenient.
- Daegu High Court (Criminal Division 1-2, Presiding Judge Wang Hae-jin) dismissed both appeals and upheld the three-year sentence.
- The court found it difficult to conclude that A clearly foresaw or intended the fatal outcome at the time of the push. While A had a prior criminal record, he had no significant offenses since 2017. These factors, combined with the limited foreseeability of death from a single push, supported maintaining the original sentence rather than increasing or reducing it.
Key Takeaways
- The charge of injury causing death (상해치사) applies where physical force — not intended to kill — results in death. It carries a heavier sentence than simple assault or negligence, but lighter than manslaughter, and the lack of clear intent to kill is a significant sentencing factor.
- A single shove that causes a fall can constitute the physical force element of the offense where the resulting injury leads to death — even if the push itself appears relatively minor.
- Foreseeability of the fatal outcome is a core sentencing consideration. Where the death resulted from a specific environmental factor — here, a concrete pavement surface — that the defendant may not have specifically anticipated, courts will temper the sentence accordingly.
- The combination of a serious outcome, limited specific foreseeability of death, and a relatively clean recent record produced a three-year sentence that both the defendant and the prosecution considered suboptimal — a sign the court assessed it as appropriately calibrated.
Why This Matters
This case illustrates the tragic intersection of intoxication, relationship conflict, and the unforgiving physics of concrete surfaces. For practitioners, it is a reminder that injury causing death charges can arise from a single act of physical force in domestic or relationship disputes — and that the absence of intent to kill does not prevent a substantial custodial sentence where the outcome is fatal. For the public, it underscores that physical contact during arguments, however routine it may feel in the moment, carries risks that can be catastrophic and legally irreversible.
Article: https://www.kyeonggi.com/article/20260919580022
Leave a Reply